Saved From the Drain

Saved from the Drain

by Kelly Bastone | Oct 25, 2018 | Headwaters Magazine, Reuse, Water Legislation, Water Use |

Courtesy of: Adobe Stock

The concept of “One Water” gains traction in Colorado with regulatory updates and innovative design.

In most households and businesses, every drop of clean, incoming water has just one job to do. That task might be to wash clothes, fill a drinking glass, bathe a human or flush a toilet—but once its job is done, water has historically shared the same fate: It’s swirled down the drain to a wastewater treatment plant and released back into nature. Then the cycle of collecting water begins again.

Yet water is scarcer than ever, thanks to climate change and growing human populations. So across Colorado and nationwide, communities are developing systems for recycling their wastewater. While municipal and larger regional water reuse systems are increasingly common in Colorado, not everyone is located near them. Even within municipalities where water is reused through a large centralized system, some big water users want to take the next step toward sustainability—by conducting their own localized water treatment and recycling efforts, on site.

Rural homes have long used septic systems, the most common form of on-site wastewater management. But since the 1980s, particularly in the eastern United States, a growing number of homes, neighborhoods, housing developments, office and school campuses, and communities have also installed localized water treatment systems that let residents use their own recycled wastewater for irrigation, toilet-flushing, and other non-potable uses. New York’s 92-acre Battery Park City redevelopment uses wastewater and rainwater recycling systems in six of its buildings. There, localized reuse demonstrates sustainable urban development—a goal driven by the city’s ambitions—with reuse improving water quality by reducing the amount of discharged wastewater and the quantity of water supply needed. The water is then reused for flushing toilets, cooling, laundry, and garden irrigation. And at Gillette Stadium, home of the New England Patriots in Foxborough, Mass., a localized system was developed because the town couldn’t otherwise supply the water needed for the stadium, nor could it readily address wastewater discharge requirements. The solution: Water used by fans at the stadium is captured, cleaned through a membrane bioreactor treatment plant, and reused for toilets, cooling, and other on-site purposes.

Colorado, while new to on-site reuse, is in the process of developing regulations to protect public health, making it easier and safer to implement localized systems in the state. If passed, these new regulations will bring a new level of purpose to the word localized. “Historically, these [localized systems in other states] were treated as wastewater systems and were permitted under whatever small system rules existed,” says Ed Clerico, engineer and CEO emeritus with Natural Systems Utilities, where he has worked on more than 200 localized systems across the country. “Now you’re admitting it’s really a water supply system as much as it is a wastewater system.” Colorado’s current rulemaking—modifying Regulation 84, which will be voted on by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission in October—marks the first time in the United States that there will be a statewide non-potable water regulation tied to localized systems, Clerico says.

“Once you see the benefits of this approach, it becomes obvious that using non-potable water for many purposes is pragmatic.” – Ed Clerico, Natural Systems Utilities

Overall demand for new water supplies in Colorado is only likely to increase in the future. The state’s population, now 5.3 million, is expected to nearly double by 2050, and by then, Colorado could come up as much as 163 billion gallons short of its annual water needs, according to Colorado’s Water Plan. Indeed, the specter of water scarcity is driving the call for localized water systems in Colorado and spurring the desire to maximize each drop of water.

Such efforts are part of the One Water movement, which promotes an integrated approach to water management. Instead of conducting separate (and siloed) efforts to manage stormwater, wastewater, and drinking water, One Water projects use more holistic systems that treat water differently depending on its intended use. Recycling wastewater—or giving water more than one job to do—plays a key role in such systems.

While One Water can be practiced on any scale, Colorado’s draft regulatory language geographically defines localized systems as “domestic wastewater treatment works that receive water from a single building, multiple buildings within a single area bounded by specific streets, or a designated district within a city or county.”

Localized systems often become economically feasible with mid-sized projects, or systems processing less than 500,000 gallons of water per day and more than 10,000-15,000 gallons per day, says Clerico. But the economic feasibility of these projects depends on many factors including the cost of the water supply and wastewater services that you’re offsetting, and, in the case of Gillette Stadium, whether existing centralized infrastructure is available.

Both are working factors in the plans for Elbert County’s Independence Community. If approved, each of the 920 homes on the 1,011-acre development will have two water connections: one potable, one non. Wastewater will flow to an on-site recovery facility that will return treated water back to the homes for lawn irrigation.

The Independence Community isn’t situated on a naturally renewable water source—furthermore, Elbert County limits the amount that developments can draw from the Denver Basin Aquifer. Using a localized water treatment system is making the development viable where it wouldn’t have been otherwise.

There isn’t another “local” water source, and importing water from a distant source doesn’t make economic sense. “Piping and pumping can be more expensive than the treatment itself, so that’s not going to happen,” explains David Takeda, a veteran water engineer who owns Denver-based MSK Consulting, which is helping design the Independence Community. “When you have a more localized facility,” Takeda continues, “your ability to use that water locally becomes more possible, because it’s actually close to you.”

Such systems are admittedly more complex, says Takeda. They require separate pipes and storage facilities for potable and non-potable water. That imposes greater risks and administrative challenges. “It’s a more complicated facility to run, and requires operators that have training in fail-safe procedures.”

The proposed modifications to Regulation 84 include automated data collection and system monitoring to keep localized systems cost effective and safe. If approved, Regulation 84 will no longer apply just to centralized reuse systems but will include localized systems treating water for landscape irrigation, agricultural irrigation, fire protection, toilet flushing, and other industrial and commercial uses—it does not apply to potable water uses.

“Direct potable reuse through localized reuse systems has not happened within our market area,” Clerico says. “It’s not something we promote because at this time we can get enough benefit from non-potable systems.” Even so, the use of localized reuse to purify water to drinking quality is feasible, just not yet economically viable, and water isn’t yet scarce enough that it’s necessary, Clerico says.

But some are already prepping for that future, where they can keep even more of their water on site. Denver’s Sun Valley EcoDistrict Trust, just south of Sports Authority Field at Mile High Stadium, has such a vision, but is starting with plans for localized non-potable reuse. “We’re committed to realizing net zero water when it’s legal,” says Isabelle Wolfe, project manager for the redevelopment project. “But the question becomes, how much infrastructure do we install for that future system?”